RESEARCH QUESTION: Are some non-2PN zygotes normally fertilized, euploid and thus available for transfer? DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of patient data from 1214 PGT-A cycles from a single private IVF clinic. A total of 152 non-2PN embryos were assessed by PGT-A with parent of origin assessment, and were compared with 4822 2PN embryos assessed by PGT-A. Transfer outcomes of euploid embryos were then compared. RESULTS: Over 40% of the tested non-2PN embryos were euploid. The 152 non-2PN (89 ICSI, 63 IVF), embryos were 2×0PN, 50×1PN, 24×2.1PN, 65×3PN, 9×4PN and 2×5PN. Of 4822 2PN embryos, 4737 (98.2%) were diploid, 1.4% polyploid and 0.4% haploid. Embryos resulting from 1PN zygotes were more likely to be haploid, and embryos resulting from 3PN and 4PN zygotes were more likely to be polyploid (P < 0.001). A total of 44 out of 89 (50%) ICSI embryos were either haploid or polyploid, significantly higher than those derived from IVF (16/63 [25.4%], P = 0.004). Maternal origin of polyploidy was more common in ICSI cases (P = 0.005). A total of 42% of the 93 diploid non-2PN embryos were also euploid, with diploid blastocysts from non-2PN zygotes likely to be euploid as those from diploid 2PN zygotes (P = 0.10). Twelve euploid 1PN, 2.1PN and 3PN embryos were transferred; two ongoing pregnancies and four live births have been reported. CONCLUSIONS: This approach extends the use of PGT-A in identifying more embryos available for transfer, has the potential to increase cumulative pregnancy rates and questions the value of the fertilization check.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hashimi et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: