Key result
Higher hospital surgical volume is linked to lower mortality, identifying an empirical threshold of 250 annual CABGs.
Why the study?
The Leapfrog Initiative's procedural volume thresholds for selective referral may not optimally discriminate between high- and low-mortality hospitals for certain surgeries.
Observational
Yes
Leapfrog thresholds may not discriminate mortality risk in academic centers; leaves open need for data-driven, procedure-specific volume standards.
In Brief Objective: The original Leapfrog Initiative recommends selective referral based on procedural volume thresholds (500 coronary artery bypass graft [CABG] surgeries, 30 abdominal aortic aneurysm [AAA] repairs, 100 carotid endarterectomies [CEA], and 7 esophagectomies annually). We tested the volume-mortality relationship for these procedures in the University HealthSystem Consortium (UHC) Clinical DatabaseSM, a database of all payor discharge abstracts from UHC academic medical center members and affiliates. We determined whether the Leapfrog thresholds represent the optimal cutoffs to discriminate between high- and low-mortality hospitals. Methods: Logistic regression was used to test whether volume was a significant predictor of mortality. Volume was analyzed in 3 different ways: as a continuous variable, a dichotomous variable (above and below the Leapfrog threshold), and a categorical variable. We examined all possible thresholds for volume and observed the optimal thresholds at which the odds ratio is the highest, representing the greatest difference in odds of death between the 2 groups of hospitals. Results: In multivariate analysis, a relationship between volume and mortality exists for AAA in all 3 models. For CABG, there is a strong relationship when volume is tested as a dichotomous or categorical variable. For CEA and esophagectomy, we were unable to identify a consistent relationship between volume and outcome. We identified empirical thresholds of 250 CABG, 15 AAA, and 22 esophagectomies, but were unable to find a meaningful threshold for CEA. Conclusions: In this group of academic medical centers and their affiliated hospitals, we demonstrated a significant relationship between volume and mortality for CABG and AAA but not for CEA and esophagectomy, based on the Leapfrog thresholds. We described a new methodology to identify optimal data-based volume thresholds that may serve as a more rational basis for selective referral. This report investigates the relationship between surgical procedural volume and mortality in a database of US academic medical centers and their affiliates, the University HealthSystem Consortium Clinical Database SM. We tested the ability of the volume thresholds proposed by the Leapfrog Group to discriminate between high- and low-quality hospitals, as reflected by in-hospital mortality rate. We then used the data to determine empirical volume thresholds and compared these to the Leapfrog thresholds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Christian et al. (2003) conducted an observational in Coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair, carotid endarterectomy (CEA), and esophagectomy. Hospital surgical volume vs. Lower surgical volume was evaluated on In-hospital mortality. Hospital surgical volume was significantly associated with mortality for CABG and AAA repair, yielding optimal empirical annual volume thresholds of 250 for CABG, 15 for AAA, and 22 for esophagectomy.