Research question What does the British public know and think about three forms of non-conventional gestation (NCG)—surrogacy, uterus transplantation (UTx), and artificial placentas (AP)—and their variants: traditional surrogacy (TS), gestational surrogacy (GS), and UTx from living (LUTx) versus deceased donors (DUTx)? Design A quota-sampled cross-sectional online survey experiment in the United Kingdom recruited 1,646 adults (51% female) via a research panel. Respondents were randomly assigned to surrogacy (n=548), UTx (n=549), or AP (n=549) conditions. Within-subject ratings assessed TS versus GS and LUTx versus DUTx. Subjective knowledge and attitudes were measured before socio-demographic variables. Complete-case data were analysed using ANOVA, correlations, and linear regressions. Results The percentage of respondents with positive attitudes varied across surrogacy (85.9%; n=471/548), UTx (82.0%; n=450/549), and AP (64.8%; n=356/549). Variant-specific information reduced support for surrogacy and UTx, although attitudes remained favourable. Differences in support between surrogacy/UTx, TS/GS, and LUTx/DUTx were not significant. Most participants (74.3-82.7%) reported low knowledge of NCGs. Higher subjective knowledge predicted more positive attitudes towards UTx (β=.11), LUTx (β=.13), and AP (β=.38). Age negatively predicted attitudes towards UTx (β=-.20), LUTx (β=-.14), and AP (β=-.22), indicating that younger respondents were more supportive of these newer NCGs, while older age predicted greater support only for TS (β=.11). Religion predicted lower support for surrogacy (β=-.15), TS (β=-.10), and GS (β=-.10). Political orientation predicted higher support for UTx (β=.15), LUTx (β=.10), and DUTx (β=.09). Other demographics had minimal effects. Conclusions Public support for NCGs is shaped by the level of detail provided as well as subjective knowledge and socio-demographic factors, although associations vary across NCG forms and variants. Further research should examine information sources and other influences on attitudes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Park-Morton et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: