Why the study?
The prognosis and benefit of reperfusion therapies specifically in nonagenarian stroke patients were not well characterized compared to younger elderly patients.
Does frailty predict worse functional outcome and higher mortality in older patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy for large-vessel occlusion stroke?
Cohort (n=2,468)
Yes
Does frailty predict worse functional outcome and higher mortality in older patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy for large-vessel occlusion stroke?
Frailty, assessed by the Hospital Frailty Risk Score, is an independent predictor of poor functional outcome and mortality in older patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy for stroke.
May inform prognosis in frail elderly thrombectomy candidates; leaves open whether frailty modification improves outcomes.
INTRODUCTION: Thrombolysis and endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) are standard treatments after stroke. We previously reported that these therapies benefit stroke patients over 80 years old. Now, we aimed to study reperfusion therapies specifically in nonagenarians, hypothesizing a poorer prognosis in this group. METHODS: Nonagenarian stroke patients were identified from our prospective monocentric cohort, which included consecutive patients ≥80 years old treated with thrombolysis and/or EVT from 2015 to 2019. Baseline characteristics, treatments, and outcomes, as well as complications and mortality were analyzed. RESULTS: Ninety-six nonagenarians were treated with thrombolysis (69.8%) and/or EVT (81.1%). A total of 51% had a pre-stroke modified Rankin score (mRS) ≤2. Cardioembolism was the most common etiology (67.7%). Age was associated with a higher mRS after stroke with a turning point at 90 years old: (90-99 years old: odds ratio [OR] = 0.33, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.13-0.83, p = 0.02) versus (85-89 years old: OR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.34-1.50, p = 0.38), with 80- to 84-year-old patients as the reference. In nonagenarians, previous coronary artery disease (OR = 8.02, 95% CI: 1.66-38.68, p = 0.01), initial National Institute of Health Stroke Score (NIHSS) (OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.03-1.19, p = 0.01), pre stroke independence (OR = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.08-0.71, p = 0.01), and "drip-and-ship" status (OR = 3.35, 95% CI: 1.22-9.16, p = 0.02) were associated with 3-month mortality. Nonagenarians had more baseline comorbidities (p = 0.003) and lower levels of pre-stroke independence (p = 0.002) than octogenarians (n = 261). Despite no difference in the use of acute treatments, timelines, and rates of successful reperfusion, a good functional status at 3 months was less common in nonagenarians than octogenarians (14.3% vs. 34.0%, p < 0.001) with a higher mortality (60.2% vs. 16.4%, p < 0.001). A total of 9.5% of nonagenarians experienced a symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. CONCLUSIONS: Age is a crucial factor affecting prognosis after stroke with a turning point at 90 years old. However, age alone should not be a limiting factor for treatment decision. Despite higher mortality and poorer functional prognosis overall, some nonagenarians may benefit from reperfusion therapies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Legris et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Acute ischemic stroke with large-vessel occlusion (n=2,468). Frailty (Hospital Frailty Risk Score) vs. Low frailty risk was evaluated on Favorable neurological outcome (mRS 0-2) at 90 days (OR 0.962, 95% CI 0.929-0.997, p=0.034).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: