Key result
Leadless pacemaker complications do not differ by kidney function stage, but advanced CKD carries higher mortality.
Why the study?
Limited data are available on leadless pacemaker outcomes according to different stages of chronic kidney disease.
Does leadless pacemaker implantation have similar safety and electrical performance in patients with chronic kidney disease compared to those with normal kidney function?
Cohort (n=1,748)
Yes
Does leadless pacemaker implantation have similar safety and electrical performance in patients with chronic kidney disease compared to those with normal kidney function?
Leadless pacemaker implantation shows comparable safety and electrical performance across different stages of chronic kidney disease compared to normal kidney function, despite higher all-cause mortality in end-stage CKD.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
LPM safety and performance appear comparable across CKD stages; supports use in renal impairment but leaves open need for randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: Limited data are available on leadless pacemaker (LPM) outcomes according to different stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD). OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in the safety and efficacy of LPMs among patients stratified per different stages of renal function. METHODS: Consecutive patients enrolled in the multicenter international i-LEAPER registry (International LEAdless PacemakEr Registry) were analyzed. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to CKD stage. The primary end point was the comparison of LPM-related major complication rate at implantation and during follow-up. Differences in electrical performance were deemed secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 1748 patients enrolled, 33% were in CKD stage G3a/G3b and 9.4% were in CKD stage G4/G5. Patients with CKD presented cardiovascular comorbidities more frequently. During a median follow-up of 39 months (interquartile range [IQR] 18-59 months), major complication rate did not differ between groups (normal kidney function [NKF] group 1.8% vs CKD stage G3a/G3b group 2.9% vs CKD stage G4/G5 group 2.4%; P = .418). All-cause mortality resulted higher in the CKD stage G4/G5 group than in the NKF group (19.5% vs 9.8%; adjusted hazard ratio 1.9; 95% confidence interval 1.25-2.89; P = .003). LPM electrical performance was comparable between groups, except for patients with CKD who showed a slightly higher pacing threshold during 1-month follow-up (NKF group 0.50 V [IQR 0.35-0.70 V] vs G3a/G3b group 0.56 V [IQR 0.38-0.81 V] vs G4/G5 group 0.51 V [0.38-0.84 V] @ 0.24 ms; P < .001). CONCLUSION: In a real-world setting, patients with advanced CKD who underwent LPM implantation were underrepresented. Although all-cause mortality was higher in end-stage CKD, periprocedural complications and LPM performance were overall comparable between NKF and different stages of CKD, except for higher values of pacing threshold in patients with CKD up to first-month follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mitacchione et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in Chronic kidney disease in patients requiring leadless pacemakers (n=1,748). Advanced chronic kidney disease (stage G4/G5) vs. Normal kidney function was evaluated on LPM-related major complication rate at implantation and during follow-up (p=.418). In patients receiving leadless pacemakers, major complication rates were similar across kidney function stages (P=0.418), though all-cause mortality was higher in stage G4/G5 vs normal function (HR 1.9).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: