A guiding principle in the efficient estimation of rare-event probabilities by Monte Carlo is that importance sampling based on the change of measure suggested by a large deviations analysis can reduce variance by many orders of magnitude. In a variety of settings, this approach has led to estimators that are optimal in an asymptotic sense. We give examples, however, in which importance sampling estimators based on a large deviations change of measure have provably poor performance. The estimators can have variance that decreases at a slower rate than a naive estimator, variance that increases with the rarity of the event, and even infinite variance. For each example, we provide an alternative estimator with provably efficient performance. A common feature of our examples is that they allow more than one way for a rare event to occur; our alternative estimators give explicit weight to lower probability paths neglected by leading-term asymptotics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Glasserman et al. (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: