Key result
Fatty acids augment IKs current only when hminK is co-expressed with KvLQT1.
Why the study?
The mechanism by which dietary fatty acids confer protection against cardiac arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death is not resolved.
hminK-dependent IKs augmentation by fatty acids should not yet inform practice; leaves open in vivo effects on repolarization and arrhythmia risk.
The mechanism by which dietary fatty acids confer protection against cardiac arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death is not resolved. Here, we study the effects of several known cardio-protective and arrhythmogenic fatty acids on the slowly activating delayed rectifier potassium current (IKs), which is responsible for the repolarization phase of the cardiac action potential. cRNAs encoding either or both of the two subunits, KvLQT1 and hminK, that together produce IKs, were injected into Xenopus oocytes, and the effects of various fatty acids were determined. Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) significantly augmented IKs as did the short-chained fully saturated lauric acid, and to a lesser extent the cis-unsaturated oleic acid. Eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) was without significant effect on current magnitude, although it reduced the rate of activation. These results suggest that not all "antiarrhythmic" fatty acids target the same channel. To examine the role of hminK in this response, KvLQT1 was expressed alone. In this case, DHA, lauric acid, and oleic acid did not augment current, suggesting that hminK confers fatty acid sensitivity to IKs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Doolan et al. (2002) studied Cardiac arrhythmias (preclinical model). Fatty acids (DHA, lauric acid, oleic acid) and ML277 vs. Control (KvLQT1 expressed alone or unbound channel) was evaluated on IKs current magnitude and KCNQ1 channel activation. Docosahexaenoic acid, lauric acid, and oleic acid augmented the slowly activating delayed rectifier potassium current (IKs) only when hminK was co-expressed with KvLQT1, indicating that hminK confers fatty acid sensitivity to the channel.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: