Key result
Lowering confidence slider visualizes residual gaps to terminate pseudo-focal atrial tachycardia in 3 cases.
Why the study?
Visualization of residual gaps after linear ablation in pseudo-focal macroreentrant atrial tachycardias is challenging and may benefit from improved mapping techniques.
Does lowering the confidence slider using the LUMIPOINT module improve visualization of residual gaps in patients with pseudo-focal atrial tachycardia?
Case Report (n=3)
No
Does lowering the confidence slider using the LUMIPOINT module improve visualization of residual gaps in patients with pseudo-focal atrial tachycardia?
The L-CS method provides a novel approach to visualize hidden residual conduction gaps and identify critical ablation targets in complex pseudo-focal atrial tachycardias.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May aid gap visualization in pseudo-focal atrial tachycardia; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation before clinical adoption.
BACKGROUND: Macroreentrant atrial tachycardia (ATs) through epicardial conduction is depicted as a focal AT on 3-D mapping, i.e., pseudo-focal AT. A new feature of the Rhythmia mapping system (Boston Scientific), the "LUMIPOINT module", can highlight all electrocardiograms (EGMs) above a threshold determined by an adjustable confidence slider (CS). Lowering the CS (L-CS) may highlight undetected electrograms (EGMs) at the nominal CS setting, potentially enabling visualization of the critical isthmus of pseudo-focal ATs. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study included 3 ATs after linear ablation of two left atrial roof-dependent ATs (cases 1 and 2) and one peri-mitral flutter (case 3). All ATs were diagnosed as pseudo-focal AT according to an electrophysiological study and the Rhythmia mapping system with the LUMIPOINT module. The L-CS method consisted of the following steps: 1. Set the LUMIPOINT activation window to the time difference before and after the linear ablation line. 2. Highlight the two regions before and after the linear ablation line. 3. Gradually lower the CS value from the nominal setting of 85 % by 5-10 %. By the L-CS method in cases 1-3, the 2-sided highlighted areas before and after the prior linear ablation lesion gradually expanded and eventually fused. EGMs at the fusion sites of the highlighted areas exhibited fragmented EGMs with a low voltage, where a single-shot ablation terminated the targeted ATs. CONCLUSION: The L-CS method was useful for the visualization of residual gaps and identification of targeted ablation sites in cases of pseudo-focal AT after linear ablation of macroreentrant ATs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Egami et al. (2024) conducted a case report in Pseudo-focal atrial tachycardia (n=3). Lowering the confidence slider (L-CS) method using the LUMIPOINT module vs. Nominal confidence slider setting (85%) was evaluated on Visualization of residual gaps and identification of targeted ablation sites. The L-CS method successfully visualized residual gaps and identified targeted ablation sites, leading to termination of pseudo-focal atrial tachycardia in all 3 cases.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: