Passive antibody can both suppress and augment immune responses. Until recently, there was virtual unanimity on the importance of the interaction of the Fc portion of modulating antibody with Fc-receptors (Fc-signalling), especially in experiments involving the suppression by antibody. Experiments reported in the last few years, that do not demonstrate the range of Fc-portion/Fc-receptor influences on the suppression of immune responses by passive antibody, have introduced new uncertainty into this field. The purpose of this paper is to review how the initial controversy on the influence of Fc-signalling in inhibition by passive antibody was resolved. Old and new approaches are suggested that may help in resolving the current uncertainty engendered by recent experimental results that were interpreted to mean that passive suppressive antibody does not utilize the inhibitory FcgammaRIIB receptor. An understanding of the factors that influence negative Fc-signalling is needed in order to optimize clinical therapies whose action depends on the suppressive property of antibody.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nicholas R. StC. Sinclair (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: