Key result
Prehabilitation significantly reduces postoperative complications and hospital stay without impacting readmissions or quality of life.
Why the study?
The impact of prehabilitation on postoperative outcomes and its role in surgical care required investigation through recent publications.
Systematic Review
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Prehabilitation improves complications, stay, and costs in surgery; reinforces multimodal perioperative protocols while leaving optimal components open for RCTs.
Introduction: Prehabilitation entails preoperative activities designed to properly prepare a patient to undergo surgery and to improve their postoperative recovery. It follows an interdisciplinary approach by improving physical fitness and nourishment status, using mental training and encouraging them to quit addictions. Aim: The aim of the study was to investigate the recent publications in the field of prehabilitation. Methods: We performed a systematic review in the PubMed database using the search term “preopreative OR before surgery, postoperative OR after surgery, prehabilitation”. The inclusion criteria were studies with a minimum population of 50 patients, including preoperative interventions, defined with a word prehabilitation, and describing their impact on the postoperative course of the patients. A total of 373 records were returned and 13 studies were finally included in the analysis. Results: According to the selected studies, prehabilitation significantly improves postoperative complication rate, length of hospital stay, postoperative physical activity, treatment costs, perioperative transfusion rate, antibiotic administration, and patients’ adherence to postoperative recommendations. On the other hand, no statistically significant impact was found for prehabilitation on quality of life, psychological condition, readmission rate, or reoperations. Discussion: Prehabilitation promotes the development of multimodal care, putting the patient’s well-being in the center. Numerous studies have indicated positive results from prehabilitation programs. The final results depend on the prehabilitation protocol, the group of patients, and the standard of care of the center. Conclusion: Prehabilitation is necessary to provide the highest quality of care for a surgical patient. An interdisciplinary approach benefits the patient during the operation as well as in the postoperative period. Every surgical clinic should be aware of the concept of prehabilitation and should possibly create their own programs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeske et al. (2022) conducted a systematic review in Surgery. Prehabilitation was evaluated on Postoperative course (complication rate, length of hospital stay, physical activity, etc.). Prehabilitation significantly improved postoperative complication rates, length of hospital stay, and physical activity, but had no significant impact on quality of life or readmission rates.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: