Methylation of DNA is an epigenetic process which modulates gene expression [1]. In the mammalian genome, methylation is almost exclusively observed at cytosines 5′ to guanosines, i.e. in the CpG dinucleotides. Many of these CpG islands are associated with promoters [2,3]. Methylation of CpGs in the promoter region has the potential to silence gene expression. Mechanisms accounting for diminished or abrogated gene expression following CpG methylation comprise blocking of the binding of sequence-specific trans-activating proteins or binding of proteins that interfere with transcription [3,4]. Prominent examples of gene silencing induced by CpG methylation comprise X-chromosome inactivation in females, developmental transcriptional regulation, genomic imprinting, carcinogenesis and tissue-specific expression of a gene [5–8]. A family of DNA methyltransferases (DNMTs) that can catalyse cytosine methylation in different sequence contexts has been identified. Inhibition of DNMT enzymes by xenobiotics, antisense or small interfering RNA resulted in lower steady-state methyltransferase activity, global or gene-specific methylation and, most interestingly, in re-expression of silenced genes [9,10]. Such a reactivation of genes by inhibitors of DNMTs, including 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine (decitabine) and 5-azacytidine (azacitidine), has been shown to be clinically useful for the treatment of tumours attributable to repressed tumour suppressor genes or in subjects with β-thalassaemia or sickle cell anaemia by inducing hypomethylation of the γ-globin chain gene with effectively increased production of fetal haemoglobin [10,11]. In studies of normal healthy volunteers it is interesting to observe that the antiarrhythmic drug procainamide reverses CpG island hypermethylation [7,12]. A fascinating observation is the distinct cell type-specific expression of the native erythropoietin gene in infrequent interstitial peritubular cells [8]. In this gene, the promoter and 5′-untranslated region comprise a CpG island; methylation of the CpG island correlates inversely with expression and, furthermore, methylation of this CpG island was shown to induce recruitment of a methyl-CpG-binding protein to the promoter and to block the association of nuclear proteins with consecutive inhibition of expression [8,13]. Similarly to erythropoietin, the 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase enzyme (11β-HSD2) exhibits a remarkable cell-specific constitutive expression in mineralocorticoid target tissues such as epithelial cells from the renal cortical collecting duct [14,15]. The main function of the 11β-HSD2 enzyme is to protect the non-selective mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) from activation by 11β-hydroxyglucocorticoids, such as cortisol in humans or corticosterone in rodents. A reduced activity of 11β-HSD2 leads an overactivation of the MR by cortisol, with renal sodium retention, hypokalaemia and a salt-sensitive increase in blood pressure. Recently, CpG islands covering the promoter and exon 1 of 11β-HSD2 were found to be densely methylated in tissues and cell lines with low expression but not those with high expression of 11β-HSD2. Demethylation induced by 5-aza-2′-deoxycytidine and procainamide enhanced the transcription and activity of the 11β-HSD2 enzyme in human cells in vitro and in rats in vivo. Methylation of 11β-HSD2 promoter–luciferase constructs decreased transcriptional activity, and methylation of recognition sequences of transcription factors known to be relevant for the expression of this enzyme diminished their binding activity, indicating a role for the epigenetic mechanism of DNA methylation for the expression of this gene causally linked with hypertension [7]. A second gene possibly linked with blood pressure regulation, endothelin-converting enzyme (ECE-1c), recently has been shown to exhibit CpG islands in the promoter [16]. In vitro methylation of these islands reduced the activity of the ECE-1c promoter. These observations made in cell cultures must be clarified by investigations in vivo, because methylation is a phenomenon that can occur in cell cultures as a result of the inability of cell lines to express all of the functions typical of the tissue from which they were derived. The prevalence of neoplastic diseases increases with age. For many of the genes associated with carcinogenesis, altered CpG methylation has been described to be initiated during the course of ageing [17]. Similarly, the prevalence of hypertension increases with age and it is conceivable that the same fundamental molecular mechanism, CpG methylation, accounts at least in part for the age-dependent appearance of both disease states. The demonstration that the degree of CpG methylation in the promoter of the 11β-HSD2 gene determines activity and tissue-specific expression of this enzyme provides a kind of proof of principle for the relevance of the methylation status of pivotal genes for blood pressure control. It is difficult to predict which of the many candidate genes involved in the regulation of blood pressure should be investigated with respect to their relevance to DNA methylation, because most housekeeping genes and ∼40% of genes with tissue-specific expression contain CpG islands [2,3] and many of these genes might change their methylation status as a function of age or in the presence of disease states. Furthermore, such changes might not be relevant due to compensatory mechanisms abrogating the overall effect on blood pressure. Promising candidates worth investigating for CpG methylation-dependent effects are those genes for which exonic mutations have been shown to induce a disease state, because these mutations unambiguously indicate that a reduced or an enhanced expression of the corresponding protein cannot be compensated by other mechanisms. The vast majority of monogenic diseases causing arterial hypertension are linked to renal sodium handling in the cortical collecting duct [18]. Thus, in a first approach, these genes are reasonable targets to be analysed with respect to regulation by the epigenetic mechanism of CpG methylation, an attractive contention in the light of the known age-dependent sodium sensitivity in humans [19]. Conflict of interest statement. None declared.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Felix Julius Frey (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: