Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Traditional training methods often lack motivational appeal, resulting in poor adherence. This proof-of-concept study examines the effects of a balance training system on cognitive and motoric function in community-dwelling older adults (CD) as well as in patients in geriatric rehabilitation (GR). Methods: The CD sample consisted of 12 participants (4 male, 8 female, age: 70.9±4.1 years, intervention: 2x/week 20–25-min. for six weeks). 15 patients in GR were included (10 women, 5 men, age: 84.7±4.2 years; intervention: 5x/week 20–25 min. 3 weeks). Prae- and post-assessments included Montreal Cognitive Assessment test (MoCA), Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) under single- (ST) and dual-task (DT) conditions, gait speed test (GSS) and Sit-to-Stand Test (STS). For the statistical analysis, a pre-post comparison was carried out within the groups and the effect size was determined. Results: The intervention groups demonstrated improvements across all tests after the balance training system (prae vs post: MoCA, CD: 25.7±2.4 vs. 27.7±1.9; GR: 23.2±4.0 vs. 24.3±3.4; TUG ST, CD: 5.9±0.6 s vs. 5.2±0.4 s; GR: 15.4±8.0 vs. 11.8±5.8 s ; TUG DT (costs) CD: 1.3±1.0 s vs. 1.0±0.8 s; GR 21.6±9.1 vs. 16.1±7.7 s; GSS: CD: 1.7±0.3 m/s vs. 2.0±0.2 m/s; GR: 0.9±0.2 vs. 1.0±0.2 m/s; STS: CD:13.7±2.5 to 15.7±2.8; GR: 11.5±7.0 vs. 16.2±8.3). All improvements despite GR TUG DT costs reached statistical significance. Discussion: The findings indicate positive effects of a balance training system on cognitive function and functional mobility in older adults. The study highlights the potential of exergames as an effective training method alternative for the elderly.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brixius et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: