This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Background: Selective modulation of the serotonin 5-HT₂C receptor is a promising strategy for treating conditions, such as obesity and neuropsychiatric disorders. Aplysinopsins, a class of marine indole alkaloids, have emerged as potential 5-HT₂C-selective scaffolds. Objective: This work aims to assess the potential of aplysinopsin-based analogues as selective 5-HT₂C ligands. Methods: study of a library of aplysinopsin analogues and related indole alkaloids using induced-fit molecular docking, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, and Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion, and Toxicity (ADMET) profiling. Results: Dozens of analogues were docked into a serotonin receptor model, revealing sub-micromolar predicted binding affinities for several compounds. Top-ranked ligands, such as tubastrindole C, achieved docking scores around -12.7 kcal/mol and maintained stable binding poses in 100-ns MD simulations. Key ligand-receptor interactions included hydrogen bonding to the conserved Asp residue in the binding pocket and extensive π-π contacts with aromatic side chains. Notably, certain analogues with modest docking scores (e.g., N-propionyl-aplysinopsin) exhibited very favorable molecular mechanics generalized born surface area (MMGBSA) binding free energies, suggesting significant induced-fit effects upon binding. Predicted pharmacokinetic properties of the lead compounds were encouraging: all hits obeyed drug-likeness rules (0-1 Lipinski's rule violations) and showed high oral absorption prospects. While polar analogues had limited blood-brain barrier permeability, several top candidates displayed moderate central nervous system (CNS) penetration scores. Conclusion: These results highlight aplysinopsin-based analogues as attractive selective 5-HT₂C ligand candidates and provide molecular insights to guide future optimization and experimental validation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Omar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: