This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Objective: To investigate the clinical effects of an ERAS-based perioperative nutrition management bundle on nutritional status (indicated by prealbumin), postoperative complications (postoperative nausea and vomiting, PONV), and patient satisfaction in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA), and to provide preliminary evidence for the standardization of ERAS nutrition protocols in orthopedic practice. Methods: = 48) using an alternating assignment method based on admission order (quasi-randomization). The control group received traditional fasting regimens, while the nutrition group implemented an ERAS-optimized protocol. The primary outcome was prealbumin (PA) level on postoperative day 3; secondary outcomes included ESR, PONV, patient satisfaction, and fasting times. Conclusion: In this prospective comparative study, an ERAS-based perioperative nutrition protocol was associated with shorter fluid fasting time, better preservation of early postoperative prealbumin levels, a lower incidence of PONV, and higher patient satisfaction compared with traditional fasting, without increasing perioperative blood loss or prolonging hospital stay. These findings support the safety and feasibility of this protocol; however, due to the quasi-randomized design and exploratory nature of the secondary analyses, these associations should be interpreted with caution. They require confirmation in larger, randomized trials with longer follow-up and functional outcome assessment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: