Key result
Positive aVR T wave fails to predict hospital MACE in NSTEMI, but links to 3VD/LMCA.
Why the study?
Lead aVR provides prognostic information in ischemia, but the role of a positive T wave in lead aVR in NSTEMI patients was unclear.
Cohort (n=400)
Odds Ratio: 1.083 (95% CI 0.496–2.365)
p-value: p=.841
Positive T wave in aVR flags severe CAD in NSTEMI; leaves open independent MACE prediction in observational data.
BACKGROUND: Lead aVR provides prognostic information in various settings in patients with ischemia. We aim to investigate the role of a positive T wave in lead aVR in non-ST segment myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). METHODS: In a prospective cohort study, we included 400 patients with NSTEMI. Presentation electrocardiogram (ECG) was investigated for presence of a positive T wave as well as ST segment elevation (STE) in aVR and study variables were compared. Predictors of primary outcome defined as hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and secondary outcome, defined as three-vessel coronary disease and/or left main coronary artery stenosis (3VD/LMCA) stenosis in angiography, were determined in multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Patients with a positive T wave in aVR were significantly older and were more likely to be female. Left ventricular ejection fraction was significantly lower in patients of positive T group. Positive T group was more likely to have 3VD/LMCA stenosis (58.3% vs. 19.8%, p < .001). The prevalence of a positive T wave in aVR was significantly higher in MACE group (54.9 % vs. 24.8%, p < .001). However, in multivariate analysis, it was not an independent predictor of MACE (OR: 1.083 95% CI: [0.496-2.365], p: .841). Though, it was independently associated with presence of 3VD/LMCA stenosis (OR: 3.747 95% CI: [2.058-6.822], p < .001). CONCLUSION: Though positive T wave in lead aVR was more common in patients with MACE; it was not an independent predictor. Additionally, a positive T wave in aVR was an independent predictor of 3VD/LMCA stenosis in NSTEMI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Separham et al. (2018) conducted a cohort in Non-ST segment myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) (n=400). Positive T wave in lead aVR vs. Absence of positive T wave in lead aVR was evaluated on Hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (OR 1.083, 95% CI 0.496-2.365, p=.841). A positive T wave in lead aVR was not an independent predictor of hospital MACE in NSTEMI patients (OR 1.083; 95% CI 0.496-2.365; p=0.841), but was independently associated with 3VD/LMCA stenosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: