We only have this paper's title and publication details.
Read it at the sourceAnswers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Captured external expert commentary on this paper, strongest first. Original sources are linked where available.
“A sobering finding is that despite the availability of highly effect medical therapy, it is underutilized. Only about 18% of patients with HFrEF are on all four pillars of guideline-directed medical therapy. Fewer than 1% reach target doses. Full implementation could save roughly 95,000 lives a year in North America. So the gap is not mainly a gap in knowledge or in drugs. It is a gap in implementation, access and care delivery.”
“HF is moving in the wrong direction on several fronts at once, even though we have more effective, affordable therapies than ever before. Age-adjusted HF-related mortality has risen about 37% since 2010, which undoes more than a decade of earlier progress, and early 2024 data suggest the rise is continuing.”
“The landscape of HF in the U.S. has changed, especially among younger adults — aged less than 65 years. HF is no longer just a disease of grandparents. Cardiometabolic HF [with preserved ejection fraction], driven by obesity, hypertension, diabetes and kidney disease has emerged as the predominant new disease in this younger population.”
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gorodeski et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: