Background: Individual psychological traits may interact with social influences to shape the development and expression of internalized misogyny among women. Aim: To examine the predictive value of sociodemographic, ideological, and psychological variables for internalized misogyny among women. Materials and Methods: An online survey was conducted with a sample of 260 women from the Republic of Serbia, aged 18 to 65 years. The psychometric battery comprised the Internalized Misogyny Scale, Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, Pearlin Mastery Scale, Gender Microaggressions Scale, Personal Experience of Gender Disempowerment Scale, Social and Economic Conservatism Scale, Right-Wing Authoritarianism Scale, and Political Orientation and Religiosity Scale. The hypotheses were evaluated using a four-step hierarchical linear regression analysis. Results: The instruments demonstrated satisfactory to excellent internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α = 0.74 - 0.92). The final hierarchical regression model explained 22% of the variance in internalized misogyny (R² = .22, p < .05). In the final step, right-wing political orientation (β = .15, p < .05), right-wing authoritarianism (β = .18, p < .05), and perceived gender-based microaggressions (β = .12, p < .05) emerged as statistically significant positive predictors. Conversely, higher self-esteem (β = -.14, p < .05) and greater mastery (β = -.21, p < .05) were significant negative predictors of internalized misogyny. Sociodemographic factors and social conservatism did not retain significant predictive value in the final model. Conclusion: The results of our study provide actionable guidance for nursing professionals in designing targeted mental health interventions aimed at mitigating the psychological burden of internalized gender oppression.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ivanović et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: