Key result
Doxorubicin plus ifosfamide yields partial pulmonary metastatic response in primary right atrial angiosarcoma.
Why the study?
Cardiac angiosarcoma is a rare tumor with nonspecific symptoms leading to unexpected and delayed diagnosis, requiring increased awareness for timely identification.
Case Report (n=1)
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Case reports of delayed cardiac angiosarcoma diagnosis urge vigilance for nonspecific symptoms; leaves open optimal early-detection strategies.
Cardiac angiosarcoma is a rare entity. The incidence through autopsy findings ranges between 0.001% and 0.03%. The disease usually presents with non-specific symptoms, although asymptomatic cases are frequent; therefore, diagnosis is unexpected and consequently delayed. The authors report the case of a middle-aged man with a recent onset cough and dyspnea. He sought medical care several times without receiving a definite diagnosis until a plain chest radiography was taken showing a mediastinal enlargement, which was the reason why he was hospitalized for clinical investigation. During the diagnostic workup, an echodopplercardiogram and a thoracic computed tomography were performed, showing a heterogeneous soft-tissue mass infiltrating the pericardium and the anterior atrial wall. Multiple and scattered pulmonary nodules were also present. A pulmonary nodule was biopsied, which revealed an angiosarcoma. The clinical features added to the radiological and histological findings permitted the diagnosis of right atrial angiosarcoma. The authors highlight the unexpected pattern in the presentation of cardiac tumors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Crenitte et al. (2014) conducted a case report in Cardiac angiosarcoma (n=1). Doxorubicin and ifosfamide chemotherapy was evaluated. Doxorubicin and ifosfamide chemotherapy resulted in a partial radiological reduction of pulmonary metastases in a 63-year-old man with primary right atrial angiosarcoma, before fatal septic shock.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: