Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: Digital subtraction catheter angiography (DSA) is utilized at our institution in addition to MRI for treatment planning of arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) stereotactic radio surgery (SRS).We hypothesized MRI over-predicts the size of AVM nidus and compared MRI alone versus combined imaging as input for target delineation for AVM SRS.Methods: 90 AVMs from 78 patients treated with SRS at our institution from March 2013 to July 2017 were retrospectively analyzed.A Neuroradiologist contoured the AVM nidus from MRI alone in a blinded manner.In addition to volumetric parameters from the treatment planning software, DICOM images were exported to abstract the spatial information of the contoured volumes.Results: Of the evaluable 81 AVMs from 69 patients, all underwent MRI and DSA.40 patients (58%) were male and median age was 36 (range 3-72).Median target volume from SRS treatments, AVM nidus generated by MRI alone and DSA alone were 1.33 cm 3 , 1.13 cm 3 , and 1.30 cm 3 , respectively.The ratios of these volumes were also not significantly different, refuting our hypothesis.Interestingly, a strong agreement was found between the target and DSA-generated volume.Spatial analysis of these volumes with DICE and Jaccard Index (JI) revealed significantly greater similarity and overlap between the target and DSA-generated volume than with MRI-generated volume (p < 0.0001).Conclusions: SRS target AVM volume at our institution is significantly more similar to DSA-generated volume than that of MRI.This finding indicates our neurosurgeons and neurovascular surgeons rely more on the vascular data of DSA containing temporal and spatial information, albeit in a two-dimensional (2D) format when creating the target AVM nidus volume.Furthermore, a significant number of cases showed disagreement between the volumes delineated by MRI and DSA.Together, these findings support the need for multimodality image acquisition for effective treatment planning of AVM SRS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pinho et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: