BACKGROUND: Brain arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) with high-risk angioarchitecture features are associated with the risk of hemorrhage. This study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of a combined approach involving targeted embolization of high-risk components and stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). METHODS: This single-center retrospective study included 17 consecutive patients with 17 AVMs with high-risk components who underwent targeted embolization and SRS. Technical success, procedural complications, obliteration rates, and hemorrhage during the latency period were assessed. RESULTS: Of the total, 15 (88%) patients had a history of AVM rupture. Target embolization using liquid embolic material was successful in 16 (94%) patients, with minimal embolization of the nidus (median, 2.8%). Complications related to embolization occurred in three (17.6%) patients, with only one (5.9%) experiencing a minor persistent deficit. Among the 14 patients with >1 year follow-up (median 60 months), complete AVM obliteration was confirmed in 9 (64%) patients, and the cumulative obliteration rates at 3, 5, and 7 years after SRS were 35%, 54%, and 85%, respectively. Target embolization was unsuccessful in one patient (5.9%), who experienced hemorrhage during the latency period. One bleeding event occurred during the latency period (1/17, 5.9%). CONCLUSIONS: MTE combined with SRS may represent a feasible strategy for morphologically high-risk brain AVMs, with the potential to reduce latency-period hemorrhage without clearly compromising nidus obliteration. However, given the small cohort and lack of a control group, the observed reduction in hemorrhage risk should be interpreted cautiously. These findings support the value of this approach as a proof-of-concept, but further prospective studies with larger cohorts are needed to confirm its clinical benefit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koizumi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: