Background and Aims: Videolaryngoscopy (VL) improves glottic visualisation, yet successful endotracheal intubation may remain challenging. Although this discrepancy is well recognised, the underlying patterns of tube-delivery difficulty (TDD) remain poorly described. Using recorded VL intubations, we aimed to describe patterns of TDD and assess whether these patterns could be reproducibly identified during VL-assisted intubation using a structured classification system. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective observational study, 176 VL recordings obtained during routine clinical practice were reviewed. Videos with adequate visualisation of the glottic inlet and complete recording of the tube-delivery phase were included. TDD was defined as any deviation from smooth tube advancement despite an adequate glottic view. Tube-delivery events were categorised into predefined phenotypes based on trajectory and site of obstruction. Two independent reviewers assessed TDD and phenotype classification. Interrater reliability was evaluated using Cohen’s kappa. Results: Of 176 screened recordings, 150 were included. TDD was identified in 67 (44.7%) cases. The most frequent pattern was excessive posterior trajectory towards the oesophageal inlet (29.9%), followed by subglottic advancement failure after passage through the vocal cords (22.4%), posterior impingement at the arytenoid level (17.9%) and lateral misplacement into the pyriform fossa (14.9%). Interrater agreement was substantial for identification of TDD (observed agreement 88.7%; κ = 0.74) and video-quality grading (86.1%; κ = 0.68) and moderate for phenotype classification (78.0%; κ = 0.61). Conclusion: VL recordings identified distinct, reproducible patterns of TDD. Recognition of these patterns may improve understanding of tube-delivery dynamics and may assist in documentation and future research in difficult airway management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Desurkar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: