// Nicola de’Angelis 1 , Frederic Pigneur 2 , Aleix Martínez-Pérez 3 , Giulio Cesare Vitali 4 , Filippo Landi 5 , Teresa Torres-Sánchez 3 , Victor Rodrigues 5 , Riccardo Memeo 1 , Giorgio Bianchi 1 , Francesco Brunetti 1 , Eloy Espin 5 , Frederic Ris 4 and Alain Luciani 2 , on behalf of the EuMaRCS Study Group 1 Unit of Digestive, Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Est, UPEC, Créteil, France 2 Department of Radiology, Henri Mondor Hospital, AP-HP, University of Paris Est, UPEC, Créteil, France 3 Unit of Colorectal Surgery, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario Doctor Peset, Valencia, Spain 4 Service of Abdominal Surgery, Geneva University Hospitals and Medical School, Geneva, Switzerland 5 Unit of Colorectal Surgery, Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario Vall d’Hebron, Barcelona, Spain Correspondence to: Nicola de’Angelis, email: nic.deangelis@yahoo.it Keywords: rectal cancer; laparoscopic surgery; total mesorectal excision; magnetic resonance imaging; pelvimetry Received: March 24, 2018 Accepted: April 28, 2018 Published: May 18, 2018 ABSTRACT Background: Locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) requires a multimodal therapy tailored to the patient and tumor characteristics. Pretreatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is necessary to stage the primary tumor, while restaging MRI, which is not systematically performed, may be of interest to identify poor responders to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (NCRT), and redefine therapeutic approach. The EuMaRCS study group aimed to investigate the role and accuracy of pretreatment (including pelvimetry) and restaging MRIs in predicting surgical difficulties and surgical outcomes in LARC therapy. Methods: Patients with mid or low LARC who were administered NCRT, who underwent laparoscopic total mesorectal excision, and for whom pretreatment and restaging MRIs were available, were included. Results: MRIs of 170 patients (median age: 61 years) were reanalyzed by the same radiologist. Pelvimetry differed significantly between males and females, but no gender difference was noted in the clinical and tumor characteristics. Tumor volume and tumor height assessed on the restaging MRI were associated, respectively, with operative time and estimated blood loss. Conversion was predicted by tumor volume, interischial distance and pubic tubercle height. The quality of the surgical resection was found to be a predictor of overall and disease-free survival. The sensitivity and specificity of tumor regression grade 1 to identify a pathologic complete response were 76.9% and 89.3%, respectively. Conclusions: In LARC management, pelvimetry and restaging MRI may be useful to predict surgical difficulties and surgical outcomes. However, the main independent predictor of patient survival appears to be the achievement of a successful surgical resection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
de’Angelis et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: