Introduction Organizations increasingly rely on visual communication to shape perceptions of organizational attractiveness, yet little is known about how corporate imagery functions as a diversity signal. Drawing on employer image theory and institutional perspectives on symbolic compliance, this study examines how Fortune 500 companies visually construct inclusivity through photographs displayed on their diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) webpages. Methods We analyzed 387 images from 340 Fortune 500 firms for demographic representation, identity cues, and visual themes. Reverse image searches using Google Image Search and TinEye were used to distinguish original photographs from stock imagery and identify images used across organizations. Results Corporate imagery primarily featured adult, light-skinned, and female individuals. Twenty percent of all images were confirmed as stock photography, with approximately three percent identified as exact duplicates sourced from major commercial providers and used across different companies. Stock imagery appeared more frequently in depictions of workplace collaboration, whereas original employee photography was more common in celebrations and industry- or role-specific contexts. Industry differences also emerged, with Financials showing the greatest reliance on stock imagery and Energy, Retailing, and Utilities favoring original photography. Discussion The findings suggest that organizations may use corporate imagery not only to communicate workforce diversity but also to symbolically construct an inclusive employer image through prefabricated representations. This study contributes to research on employer branding, authenticity, and DEI by demonstrating how corporate visuals can operate simultaneously as instrumental and symbolic signals, while reliance on stock photography raises questions about the credibility of visual diversity claims in an era of increasing scrutiny.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fiset et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: