Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The authors show that bottlenecks in the economy's ability to absorb new entrants do not explain the female/male unemployment rate differential in Canada. The "loose attachment" of women to the work force explains only one-quarter of the differential. Of overriding importance is the minimum wage. If not for minimum wages, mature women would have an unemployment rate below that of men. Relative minimum wages have been falling since 1974. Further falls could lead to a negative female/male unemployment rate differential and reverse all the standard arguments about a greater female labor force share increasing the natural rate of unemployment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anthony Myatt (1990) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: