Key result
Higher deceleration capacity linked to ~34% lower sudden cardiac death risk in HCM.
Why the study?
Precise sudden cardiac death risk stratification in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy remains challenging, and the role of deceleration capacity in risk prediction is unclear.
Does baseline cardiac deceleration capacity improve sudden cardiac death risk stratification in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Cohort (n=464)
Does baseline cardiac deceleration capacity improve sudden cardiac death risk stratification in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy?
Hazard Ratio: 0.66 (95% CI 0.546–0.799)
p-value: p=<0.001
Cardiac deceleration capacity significantly improves risk discrimination for sudden cardiac death in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, particularly among patients classified as intermediate-risk by traditional models.
May aid intermediate-risk SCD stratification in HCM; extends autonomic observations but leaves open prospective validation.
BACKGROUND: Precise sudden cardiac death risk stratification in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy remains challenging. Parasympathetic dysfunction is closely related to malignant ventricular arrhythmias, and deceleration capacity is a robust parameter to quantify vagal tone. This study aims to elucidate the association between deceleration capacity and sudden cardiac death risk in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. METHODS: A total of 648 hypertrophic cardiomyopathy patients completing 24-hour ambulatory Holter monitoring were consecutively enrolled in this cohort study. Baseline deceleration capacity was calculated from the Holter recordings. The primary endpoint was a composite of sudden cardiac death or sudden-cardiac-death-equivalent events including sudden death, resuscitated cardiac arrest, and appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapies. RESULTS: There were 464 patients included in final analysis. During mean follow-up of 827 days, 33 (7.1%) patients met primary composite endpoint. Deceleration capacity showed a significant linear inverse association with this composite endpoint (hazard ratio 0.660 [95% confidence interval, 0.546-0.799], P < 0.001). The derived cut-off value was 6.25 ms. Adding deceleration capacity to the traditional risk model significantly improved risk discrimination (C-statistic increased from 0.732 to 0.827, Delong P = 0.019) especially in the intermediate-risk subgroup (C-statistic increased from 0.565 to 0.849, Delong P = 0.011). Patients with lower deceleration capacity and elevated risk score suffered the worst outcome (Log-rank P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Deceleration capacity independently predicts sudden cardiac death risk in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and provides significant prognostic value particularly in the clinically challenging intermediate-risk subgroup. Integration of deceleration capacity into risk evaluation warrants prospective validation before guiding ICD decision-making.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lai et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (n=464). Deceleration capacity was evaluated on Composite of sudden cardiac death or sudden-cardiac-death-equivalent events including sudden death, resuscitated cardiac arrest, and appropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapies (HR 0.660, 95% CI 0.546-0.799, p=<0.001). Baseline deceleration capacity was significantly inversely associated with sudden cardiac death and equivalent events in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HR 0.660; 95% CI 0.546-0.799; P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: