Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AIMS: This study aimed to characterize real-world treatment patterns among patients in the United States with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) eligible for pembrolizumab treatment, including patients eligible for Medicare (aged ≥65 years). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed treatment utilization among patients with TNBC using two United States (US)-based electronic health record (EHR) databases (Flatiron Health Research Database and N-Power Medicine's Breast Analytical Dataset). Patients were stratified by Medicare insurance status or age ≥65 years. Treatment uptake was analyzed in cohorts of patients with a metastatic diagnosis on or after 1 January 2021, and defined by FDA-approved pembrolizumab indications in TNBC. RESULTS: Overall, 133 patients with metastatic TNBC (mTNBC) and 392 patients with early-stage TNBC (esTNBC) were included; 33.9-39.1% were Medicare-eligible. Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-(L)1) inhibitors were the most used therapy class across all Medicare-eligible cohorts with TNBC (79.0-85.0%). Use of pembrolizumab-containing regimens was observed across TNBC cohorts (77.0-85.0%). Treatment patterns in Medicare-eligible patients were consistent with the overall population. CONCLUSIONS: This real-world analysis demonstrates high uptake of PD-(L)1 inhibitors, including pembrolizumab, among Medicare-eligible patients with TNBC. These findings provide real-world insights into how regulatory approvals in TNBC have shaped clinical practice in the US.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: