This work develops a task-relative framework for characterizing transitions under admissible transformations. Rather than treating state margin as a sufficient measure of transition robustness, the framework separates task-boundary margin, accessibility, ordered transformation structure, dynamical generation scale, and boundary-contact geometry. An ordered reachable structure and minimal transition depth distinguish proximity to a task boundary from the ability of admissible transformations to reach it. A task-relative order defect characterizes cases in which different compositions of the same transformations produce different task outcomes, while a constructive higher-order example demonstrates that pairwise task-relative order information can be insufficient. The analysis then connects dynamically generated displacement scaling with task-boundary contact order. If a task-relevant displacement satisfies s(ε) = cε^w + o(ε^w) and the task margin satisfies M_J(s) = m − as^ν + o(s^ν), the resulting transition threshold obeys ε_*(m) ~ (m/(ac^ν))^(1/(wν)) under the stated local crossing assumptions. The framework distinguishes established concepts from reachability, geometric control, and nonholonomic analysis from the proposed task-relative synthesis, and identifies limitations of progressively richer transition descriptors. Stochastic propagation and mechanistic identifiability are reserved for subsequent work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ayala, Feliciano, Daniel (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: