A dominating set in a graph πΊ is a set π of vertices of πΊ such that every vertex in π β‘ ( πΊ ) β π is adjacent to a vertex in π . For π β₯ 1 an integer, a π -component dominating set first defined by Alvarado, Dantas, and Rautenbach [Discrete Math. 339 (2016), 2715β2720] is a dominating set π with the additional property that every component in the subgraph, πΊ β‘ [ π ] , of πΊ induced by π has order at least π . The π -component domination number πΎ π β‘ ( πΊ ) is the minimum cardinality among all π -component dominating sets of πΊ . We observe that the π -component domination number provides a natural generalization of both the domination number πΎ β‘ ( πΊ ) and the total domination number πΎ π‘ β‘ ( πΊ ) since πΎ 1 β‘ ( πΊ ) = πΎ β‘ ( πΊ ) and πΎ 2 β‘ ( πΊ ) = πΎ π‘ β‘ ( πΊ ) . The upper π -component domination number π€ π β‘ ( πΊ ) of πΊ is the maximum cardinality among all minimal π -component dominating sets of πΊ . For π β₯ 2 , let πΊ be a connected π -regular graph of order π . We show that for all π β₯ 1 , πΎ π β‘ ( πΊ ) β₯ ( π π β’ ( π β 1 ) + 2 ) β’ π and π€ π β‘ ( πΊ ) β€ ( 1 2 + π β 1 4 β’ π β 2 β’ ( π β 1 ) ) β’ π . Moreover, we characterize the (infinite) family of graphs achieving equality in these lower and upper bounds. These results generalize known results for the domination and total domination numbers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haynes et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: