Cybersecurity investments are critical for organizational resilience, yet their business value remains difficult to quantify, validate, and communicate to executive stakeholders. This study addresses this challenge by combining an expanded Systematic Literature Review (SLR) with a Design Science Research (DSR) approach. The SLR identifies and synthesizes 132 full-text studies and analyzes existing approaches across financial, technical, governance-related, risk-based, and temporal evaluation dimensions. The findings reveal a structural validation gap in cybersecurity investment evaluation: while many approaches support ex-ante prediction, investment justification, or risk-based decision-making, comparatively few provide mechanisms for ex-post validation of whether financial assumptions are realized through operational outcomes. This disconnect limits the ability of organizations to assess whether cybersecurity investments deliver the expected value over time. To address this gap, the paper proposes the CISO Investment Validation Loop (CIVL), a cyclical design artifact that links financial assumptions with operational proxy indicators across the cybersecurity investment lifecycle. CIVL is conceptually illustrated through a scenario involving the consolidation of legacy firewall infrastructure into a Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) architecture. The study contributes a lifecycle-oriented framework for connecting ex-ante cybersecurity investment assumptions with ex-post operational validation mechanisms and highlights the need for further empirical and practitioner-based evaluation of CIVL in real organizational settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Owoleso et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: