Key result
Malignant pericardial effusion is linked to higher recurrence despite similar one-year mortality versus non-malignant cases.
Why the study?
Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients undergoing pericardiocentesis for pericardial effusion and the role of inflammation-based biomarkers according to malignancy status and prognosis are not well characterized.
What are the clinical characteristics, recurrence rates, and differences in inflammatory biomarkers between malignancy-associated and non-malignant pericardial effusions?
Cohort (n=113)
No
What are the clinical characteristics, recurrence rates, and differences in inflammatory biomarkers between malignancy-associated and non-malignant pericardial effusions?
Malignancy-associated pericardial effusions display distinct clinical and fluid characteristics with higher recurrence rates, though standard inflammatory biomarkers may not reliably differentiate them from non-malignant effusions.
Malignancy-associated effusions linked to more dyspnea and larger size; hypothesis-generating for biomarker stratification, prospective studies needed.
Objective: We aim to characterize patients undergoing pericardiocentesis for clinically significant pericardial effusion and explore differences in inflammation-based biomarkers according to malignancy status and one-year outcome. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated 113 consecutive patients who underwent pericardiocentesis between January 2021 and January 2026. Clinical, laboratory, pericardial fluid, cytopathological, recurrence, and mortality data were analyzed. NLR, PLR, SII, SIRI, and PIV were assessed as secondary exploratory biomarkers. Results: Malignancy-associated pericardial effusion was present in 36 patients (31.9%), while 77 (68.1%) had non-malignant effusion. The malignancy-associated group had more frequent dyspnea (77.8% vs. 55.8%; p = 0.025), effusion >15 mm (80.6% vs. 58.4%; p = 0.021), hemorrhagic fluid (75.0% vs. 54.5%; p = 0.038), and recurrence (38.9% vs. 20.8%; p = 0.042). Malignant cells were identified in pericardial fluid cytology in 15/36 patients (41.7%). One-year mortality was 22.2% versus 13.0% (p = 0.211). NLR, PLR, SII, SIRI, and PIV did not differ significantly according to malignancy status or one-year mortality; NLR, PLR, and SIRI were higher in the exploratory lung cancer subgroup. Conclusions: Malignancy-associated pericardial effusion showed distinct clinical and fluid characteristics. No statistically significant associations were detected between the evaluated inflammation-based biomarkers and malignancy status or one-year mortality; however, the exploratory design and limited number of outcome events warrant cautious interpretation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Emren et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Clinically significant pericardial effusion (n=113). Malignancy-associated pericardial effusion vs. Non-malignant pericardial effusion was evaluated on One-year mortality (p=0.211). Malignancy-associated pericardial effusion had higher recurrence (38.9% vs 20.8%, p=0.042) but similar one-year mortality (22.2% vs 13.0%, p=0.211) compared to non-malignant effusion.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: