Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Certified scalar-only corrected version of A Bisector Corridor Alignment Note. For real a,b,c, assume c ≥ −1 and ((a+b)/2)² ≤ (1+c)/2; the certified conclusion is min(a,b) ≤ sqrt((1+c)/2). A second scalar inequality uses nonnegative l1,l2 and m ≤ a1,m ≤ a2 to conclude m(l1+l2) ≤ l1a1+l2a2. The square premise HQuad is explicit: the certificate does not derive it from arbitrary vectors or geometric alignments. Broader vector, ecological and arbitrary-aggregation claims of the earlier version are withdrawn from this correction. Both listed claims map to nontrivial Run-903 certified theorems and a joint satisfiability witness. The PUBLICATION_BINDING covers the exact corrected manuscript and authorized deterministic review. logical validity given the model, not empirical validation of its assumptions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Justin Hart (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: