Machine learning-based quantitative structure–activity relationship (ML-QSAR) modeling requires consistent data preparation, validation, and model comparison. We present LASSBio-classFLOW, an open, modular, and semiautomated KNIME workflow for classification-based ligand screening. It integrates basic molecular structure preparation, configurable class assignment, descriptors and fingerprints calculation, dataset partitioning, hyperparameter optimization of nine algorithms, interactive performance evaluation, user-guided model selection, and external-library prediction. As an example, the workflow was evaluated using 1408 ROCK2 compounds from ChEMBL (218 active and 1190 inactive). Models were trained and optimized by fivefold cross-validation and evaluated on a held-out 20% test set. Support vector machine (SVM) and k-nearest neighbors (kNN) provided the most consistent results across both stages. On the held-out set, SVM favored active-class precision (0.861), whereas kNN achieved higher active recall (0.750). LASSBio-classFLOW (available at https://github.com/pedrosenamp/LASSBio-classFLOW_v1.0.git) therefore provides a transparent, reusable environment for benchmarking, comparative ML-QSAR development, and flexible deployment, while preserving user control over model selection and screening decisions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pinheiro et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: