AOI margin and object height affect gaze assignment; this methodological case study separates them. In a block-imitation task by ten participants, we compared, on the same 4798 fixations, the printed working area (object and support), that area plus a 19 mm margin (separately measured gaze error), and that region raised to object height; the last two differ only in height. Height alone raised the copy area’s dwell share in all ten participants (median +2.4 percentage points), as geometry dictates. For the model’s area, whose region starts on the turntable and can lose gaze, the median was +0.4 points (−5.7 to +32.0), with five rising and five falling. In this layout, the margin moved medians more (copy +7.1, unassigned −14.5). Raised, model and right-tray regions overlapped at every viewpoint; widening them to 40 mm added a median of 0.81 points of assigned time but raised the share qualifying for multiple regions from 0.0% to 13.1%. Two raters judged 200 fixations: the raised region matched their labels more often but also assigned an area where they saw only mat; more assignment is not evidence of accuracy. Size and height are separable choices to report per participant, and their weight depends on layout, tracker and margin.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Suzuki et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: