The Québec Appalachians have been shaped by two major orogenies: the Middle to Late Ordovician Taconian and the Middle Devonian Acadian. Thrust faults and nappe structures characterized the Taconian deformation throughout the Québec Appalachians, whereas structural styles pertaining to the Acadian orogeny differ from southern Québec to the Gaspé Peninsula. Structural analysis of Late Ordovician to Middle Devonian supracrustal rocks shows two different Acadian deformational regimes: strike‐slip tectonics in the Gaspé Peninsula and thrust or dip‐slip tectonics in southern Québec. In southern Québec, Acadian regional deformation produced folds which vary from upright to overturned and tight to isoclinal from the NW to the SE. Major faults (e.g., La Guadeloupe) are northwestward directed thrust faults marked by highly ductile shear zones outlined by mylonite. In the Gaspé Peninsula, structural trend is NE and major E–W dextral strike‐slip faults transect this trend. Folds are open and upright, inclined and tighter near the major faults where they have a clockwise rotation like the regional cleavage. Major faults (e.g., Grand Pabos) follow corridors delimiting high‐strain zones where the fabrics developed are indicative of a ductilebrittle regime of deformation. In the Témiscouata region, major structural features of both southern Québec and the Gaspé Peninsula are recognized. Structures of this region consist of ENE trending dextral strike‐slip faults and high‐angle WNW verging reverse faults, parallel to major NNE folds. These structures reflect the transition from purely horizontal movement along major strike‐slip faults of the Gaspé Peninsula to vertical movement along thrust faults in southern Québec. Acadian structural variations within the Québec Appalachians are interpreted in terms of a continental collision of Gondwana along the irregular margin of Laurentian and its Taconian accreted terranes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Malo et al. (1995) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: