This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Animals exhibit a variety of behavioural defences against socially transmitted parasites. These defences evolved to increase host fitness by avoiding, resisting or tolerating infection. Because they can occur in both infected individuals and their uninfected social partners, these defences often have important consequences for the social group. Here, we discuss the evolution and ecology of anti‐parasite behavioural defences across a taxonomically wide social spectrum, considering colonial groups, stable groups, transitional groups and solitary animals. We discuss avoidance, resistance and tolerance behaviours across these social group structures, identifying how social complexity, group composition and interdependent social relationships may contribute to the expression and evolution of behavioural strategies. Finally, we outline avenues for further investigation such as approaches to quantify group‐level responses, and the connection of the physiological and behavioural response to parasites in different social contexts. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stockmaier et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: