BACKGROUND: Ileocolonoscopy (IC) detects mucosal inflammation and magnetic resonance enterography (MRE) detects transmural inflammation in Crohn disease (CD). We aimed to evaluate the relationship between the simplified magnetic resonance index of activity (MARIAs) and measures of inflammation by IC in children with newly diagnosed CD. METHODS: Retrospective review of 140 patients 6-18 years of age with CD who had baseline IC and MRE within 5 weeks of diagnosis. MARIAs was calculated for each intestinal segment (terminal ileum [TI], ascending colon, transverse colon, descending colon, sigmoid colon, rectum), defined as (1 × thickness > 3 mm) + (1 × edema) + (1 × fat stranding) + (2 × ulcers). Sensitivity and specificity were derived using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves to compare MARIAs to IC findings. RESULTS: Using IC as the reference standard, the cutoff MARIAs ≥1 identified TI segments with active inflammation with 84% sensitivity, 73% specificity, 85% positive predictive value (PPV), 70% negative predictive value (NPV), and area under the curve (AUC) 0.782 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.689-0.876). The cutoff MARIAs ≥2 identified TI segments with severe lesions with 87% sensitivity, 76% specificity, 87% PPV, 76% NPV, and AUC 0.814 (95% CI 0.712-0.916). There was poor sensitivity for all colonic segments. CONCLUSION: The MARIAs is feasible and accurate in reflecting disease activity in the TI, but not in the colon, in children with newly diagnosed CD. Although the MARIAs may be useful for monitoring TI disease activity over time, full assessment continues to require both IC and MRE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lepus et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: