Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Wearable and implantable nanoelectronics demand the heterogeneous integration of transducers, analogue front-ends, wireless power and data links, and hermetic encapsulation on substrates that remain mechanically compliant and biostable in vivo . Progress in wearable and implantable bioelectronics has been enabled by co-optimisation of material systems, process windows and packaging architectures with the capability to maintain stability under coupled mechanical, electrochemical, and thermal stresses. Nanoscale and two-dimensional semiconductors expand the design space for low-power transduction, but they impose stringent requirements on defect density, contact resistance, and encapsulation-induced strain after transfer to elastomeric substrates. This present work surveys nanomaterials and microfabrication strategies that address this systems-level requirement and complement existing material-class surveys organising the field along co-design axis of material, fabrication process, encapsulation and tissue interface. Additionally, the review presents a novel cross-material performance benchmark that compares carrier mobility, tensile-strain limit, limit of detection, encapsulation WVTR, fabrication-to-application suitability and regulatory pathway. The scope of this review is restricted to skin-mounted, intracutaneous, and intracorporeal medical devices reported between 2018 and 2026.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muhammad et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: