Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
PURPOSE: We compare the results of laparoscopic total colectomy using left-to-right dissection versus the open approach. METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic total colectomy using left-to-right dissection for familial adenomatous polyposis or synchronous colorectal cancer, were matched with 28 patients who underwent an open approach. RESULTS: No patients who underwent the laparoscopic procedure were converted to the open technique. The estimated blood loss was significantly lower in the laparoscopic group than in the open group (P=0.008). Although the operating time in the laparoscopic group was significantly longer (P<0.001), bowel function returned to the patients in this group 2 days sooner on average (P<0.001), and these patients were able to tolerate a soft diet 1 day earlier than the open group (P=0.005). There were no significant differences in postoperative complications between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic total colectomy using the left-to-right approach may be an alternative to open surgery for surgeons experienced with the laparoscopic technique.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Huh et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: