Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This was a clinical trials study of self-regulation of rhythmic stimulation in preterm infants. Infants were enrolled in three regional hospitals and followed in four outlying hospitals. Forty-five premature infants, 22 males and 23 females, enrolled at 29–33 weeks conceptional age (CA) received in the isolette either a “breathing” teddy bear (set to breathe at one-half the infant's quiet sleep respiration rate) or a nonbreathing bear. Using time-lapse videorecording at a 60:1 ratio, subjects were recorded for 3 days at the beginning of the Intervention period and again for 3 days, 2 weeks later. After discharge from the hospital, the sleep of the subjects was monitored in the home for a 24-hour period on weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 after expected date of birth (postterm). Infants with a breathing bear spent more time in contact with the bear, and increased their contact over the two weeks. Postterm, the “breathing bear babies” showed more quiet sleep and a greater increase in quiet sleep over weeks. The results indicate that premature infants (“prematures”) are capable of organizing their motility to express a preference for rhythmic stimulation, and that the experience facilitates neurobehavioral development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Thoman et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: