We consider a fractional Adams method for solving the nonlinear fractional differential equation 0 C D t α y ( t ) = f ( t , y ( t ) ) , α > 0 \,C₀Dαₜ y(t) = f(t, y(t)), \, α >0 , equipped with the initial conditions y ( k ) ( 0 ) = y 0 ( k ) , k = 0 , 1 , … , ⌈ α ⌉ − 1 y⁽ᵏ⁾ (0) = y₀⁽ᵏ⁾, k=0, 1, , α -1 . Here, α may be an arbitrary positive number and ⌈α⌉ denotes the smallest integer no less than α and the differential operator is the Caputo derivative. Under the assumption 0 C D t α y ∈ C 2 [ 0 , T ] \,C₀Dαₜ y ∈ C²[0, T] , Diethelm et al. (Numer. Algor. 36, 31–52, 2004) introduced a fractional Adams method with the uniform meshes t n = T(n/N),n = 0,1,2,…,N and proved that this method has the optimal convergence order uniformly in t n , that is O(N −2) if α > 1 and O(N −1−α ) if α ≤ 1. They also showed that if 0 C D t α y ( t ) ∉ C 2 [ 0 , T ] \,C₀Dαₜ y(t) ∉ C²[0, T] , the optimal convergence order of this method cannot be obtained with the uniform meshes. However, it is well-known that for y ∈ C m [0,T] for some m ∈ ℕ m ∈ N and 0 < α < m, the Caputo fractional derivative 0 C D t α y ( t ) \,C₀Dαₜ y(t) takes the form “ 0 C D t α y ( t ) = c t ⌈ α ⌉ − α + smoother terms \,C₀Dαₜ y(t) = c tα -α + smoother terms ” (Diethelm et al. Numer. Algor. 36, 31–52, 2004), which implies that 0 C D t α y \,C₀Dαₜ y behaves as t ⌈α⌉−α which is not in C 2[0,T]. By using the graded meshes t n = T(n/N) r ,n = 0,1,2,…,N with some suitable r > 1, we show that the optimal convergence order of this method can be recovered uniformly in t n even if 0 C D t α y \,C₀Dαₜ y behaves as t σ ,0 < σ < 1. Numerical examples are given to show that the numerical results are consistent with the theoretical results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roberts et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: