PURPOSE: To evaluate how the advances in design of the Boston type I keratoprosthesis and in the treatment strategies to conquer the post operative complications have expanded the indications and application of this technology. METHODS: A review and analysis of the keratoprosthesis literature specifically examining design modifications, treatment of post operative complications, and patient selection was performed. RESULTS: Over the past two decades, many modifications to the design of the Boston type I keratoprosthesis and treatment of the patient in the post operative period have occurred. Also, the technology has been more widely accepted as a primary surgical option for patients with a poor preoperative prognosis for traditional penetrating keratoplasty. The outcomes of visual acuity, retention, and post-operative infection rates have all significantly improved since the technology has been modified and offers patients an alternative for visual rehabilitation. CONCLUSIONS: Thanks to advances in design and perioperative care, the boston type i keratoprosthesis can now be considered a viable option for surgical visual rehabilitation in many patients with corneal pathology, and in certain groups the primary surgical procedure of choice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Traish et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: