The authors studied the influence of RuO2 nanoparticles attached to multiwalled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) emitters on field emission. The threshold field, corresponding to 10mA∕cm2, was reduced 30% to ∼0.90V∕μm after attaching the particles. However, the particles deteriorated the stability of field emitters to some extent, especially in the high emission-current-density region of several A∕cm2. The maximum emission-current density was limited to a lower current region compared with field emitters without RuO2. This can be explained reasonably by considering the vaporization of RuO2 particles that frequently causes significant self-ion-sputtering during strong emission because of the large contact resistance between the particles and MWCNTs. This explanation was experimentally proved by measuring the reduction of field-enhancement factor with the elapsed-emission time. This reduction is quicker for emitters with RuO2 than for emitters without RuO2. Experimental data also show that the standard deviation of Fowler-Nordheim plots for field emitters can be used to judge their stability and lifetime—a value of ∼5×10−3 suggests stable performance for our emitters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: