Background:Pharmacovigilance plays a pivotal role in ensuring medication safety by detecting, assessing, and preventing adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Despite being a professional and ethical responsibility, ADR reporting remains suboptimal worldwide, particularly among undergraduate prescribers. Objectives:To assess the level of knowledge, attitude, and practice regarding pharmacovigilance among MBBS student prescribers in a tertiary care hospital and to identify key barriers contributing to under-reporting of ADRs. Methods:A descriptive, cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study was conducted among 150 MBBS students actively involved in prescription writing during clinical postings. Data were collected using a validated 20-item KAP questionnaire covering fundamental concepts of pharmacovigilance, attitudes toward ADR reporting, reporting practices, and perceived barriers. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and presented as frequencies and percentages. Results:Among the participants, 112 (74.7%) were aware of the term pharmacovigilance, and 98 (65.3%) correctly identified its primary objective as the detection and prevention of ADRs. A positive attitude was observed, with 124 students (82.7%) acknowledging ADR reporting as a professional obligation and a vital component of patient safety. However, practical engagement was limited, as only 18 students (12%) had ever reported an ADR. The major barriers identified were lack of knowledge regarding reporting procedures (44.6%), difficulty in diagnosing ADRs (32%), time constraints (14%), and non-availability of reporting forms (9.3%). Conclusion:Although MBBS prescribers demonstrated satisfactory knowledge and a favorable attitude toward pharmacovigilance, actual ADR reporting practice was notably poor. This highlights a significant knowledge–practice gap that requires targeted educational and system-level interventions. Recommendations:Incorporating structured pharmacovigilance training into the undergraduate curriculum, conducting regular hands-on workshops on ADR identification and reporting, integrating ADR reporting into routine clinical teaching, and implementing user-friendly digital reporting platforms are strongly recommended to improve reporting behavior and enhance patient safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muralidhar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: