Key result
BREATH 2 score outperforms H2FPEF score for predicting mortality and HF events.
Why the study?
The prognostic value of the BREATH 2 score among patients with undiagnosed dyspnea suspected of HFpEF was unknown.
Does the BREATH 2 score predict mortality and heart failure outcomes in patients with suspected HFpEF?
Cohort (n=700)
Does the BREATH 2 score predict mortality and heart failure outcomes in patients with suspected HFpEF?
p-value: p=<0.001
The clinically derived BREATH 2 score provides significant prognostic information in dyspneic patients with suspected HFpEF, outperforming standard echocardiography-reliant scores like H2FPEF.
Background and Objectives The BREATH 2 score is a novel screening tool for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), yet its prognostic value among patients with undiagnosed dyspnea remains unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the association between the BREATH 2 score and clinical outcomes in patients with suspected HFpEF. Methods A total of 700 consecutive patients who underwent exercise stress echocardiography were included. The BREATH 2 score was calculated from seven clinical variables without using echocardiography and then participants were divided into low (0–3), intermediate (4–5), and high-score (6–9) groups. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality and heart failure (HF) events (HF hospitalization, unplanned hospital visits requiring intravenous diuretics, or intensification of oral diuretics). Results Over a median follow-up period of 776 days, the primary composite outcome was observed in 127 (18.1%) out of 700 patients with dyspnea. Higher BREATH 2 scores were associated with an increased rate of the composite outcome (log-rank p<0.001). This association remained significant in models including clinical, standard echocardiography or exercise stress echocardiography. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed superior prognostic performance of the BREATH 2 score to the H 2 FPEF score (area under the curve [AUC]=0.71 vs. 0.64; p=0.03) and the HFpEF-ABA score (AUC=0.63; p=0.01). Conclusions The BREATH 2 score provides prognostic information among dyspneic patients and may be suitable for primary care settings.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kuno et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Suspected heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (n=700). BREATH 2 score vs. H2FPEF and HFpEF-ABA scores was evaluated on Composite of all-cause mortality and heart failure (HF) events (HF hospitalization, unplanned hospital visits requiring intravenous diuretics, or intensification of oral diuretics) (p=<0.001). The BREATH 2 score predicted increased mortality and heart failure events (p<0.001) and showed superior prognostic performance to the H2FPEF score (AUC 0.71 vs 0.64; p=0.03).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: