Key result
Expert consensus identifies remote BP self-monitoring, mobile apps, and video education as top hypertension-in-pregnancy policies.
Why the study?
Hypertensive disorders are a major cause of maternal mortality, and early detection with evidence-based, context-appropriate strategies may improve outcomes.
What are the priority evidence-based policy options for the monitoring and management of hypertension in pregnancy?
Systematic Review (n=14)
What are the priority evidence-based policy options for the monitoring and management of hypertension in pregnancy?
Educational video-based training, maternal hypertension management applications, and remote self-monitoring of blood pressure were identified by experts as priority, context-appropriate policy options to empower pregnant women and improve self-management of gestational hypertension.
These options merit prospective implementation trials; extends evidence synthesis to expert-prioritized strategies for hypertension in pregnancy.
Introduction: Hypertensive disorders are a major cause of maternal mortality, and early detection can reduce risks for mothers and infants. Implementing evidence based, context appropriate strategies may improve outcomes. This study aimed to propose policy options to strengthen monitoring and management of hypertension in pregnancy. Methods: The study consisted of two phases. First, a scoping review synthesized global strategies for improving hypertension management during pregnancy. Searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, SID, and Google Scholar without time limits, restricted to English and Persian studies. Based on the findings, policy options were developed. In the second phase, 13 experts evaluated these options across five criteria—population benefit, cost/economics, ethics/equity, feasibility, and constituency acceptance—using a five point Likert scale. The top options were further analyzed for advantages, disadvantages, and implementation needs. Results: From 2,253 identified records, 14 studies informed five policy options: (a) an educational video package on hypertension and preventive self‑care; (b) a maternal mobile application for hypertension management; (c) remote self‑monitoring of blood pressure; (d) a smart multimodal management system; and (e) ambulatory monitoring with Holter devices. Experts ranked the educational video package highest overall and highest for cost/economic, ethics/equity, and feasibility, the mobile application highest for constituency acceptance, and remote blood pressure monitoring highest for population benefit. Conclusion: Integrating global evidence with expert input yielded three priority policy options: educational video‑based training, a maternal hypertension management app, and remote self‑monitoring of blood pressure. These strategies emphasize empowerment and improved self‑management for pregnant women.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mirghafourvand et al. (2026) conducted a systematic review in Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (n=14). Policy options (educational video, mobile application, remote self-monitoring) was evaluated on Expert evaluation scores across five criteria (population benefit, cost/economics, ethics/equity, feasibility, constituency acceptance) using a 5-point Likert scale. Integrating global evidence with expert input identified three priority policy options for managing hypertension in pregnancy: an educational video package, a maternal mobile application, and remote self-monitoring of blood pressure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: