Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The morphology and setation of mouth appendages (trophi) are investigated with scanning electron microscopy in the balanomorph barnacles Semibalanus balanoides, Balanus balanusand B. nubilusand in the pedunculate barnacles Pollicipes polymerus, P. cornucopiaand Lepas anatifera.It is difficult to uphold a clearcut distinction between denticles and setae and several types of setae also intergrade with each other. The trophi of Pollicipes polymerusand P. cornucopiahave the most ‘generalized’ morphology. The palps of Pollicipesand L. anatiferaare simpler than those in balanomorphs and carry a single type of seta. In L. anatiferathe mandibles and maxillules are adapted to a semi‐predatory feeding habit by carrying large, pointed teeth, but this species lacks the foliate‐serrate setae which populate the palps in the other species studied. Compared with Pollicipesand Lepas, the three balanomorphs have palps with a complex setation. The trophi in S. balanoidesdiffer from the two species of Balanusin numerous features of setation and denticulation, notably in having the palps populated by plumodenticulate setae homologous to purely denticulated types in Balanus.It is suggested that SEM studies of barnacle trophi will provide characters of use in estimating phylogeny.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Høeg et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: