This paper examines how overconfidence and self-control interact to shape household portfolio decisions within a dual-process framework. Using a nationally representative sample from the Spanish Survey of Financial Competences (ECF), we employ a double-hurdle approach to disentangle initial market participation from conditional portfolio complexity. We address endogeneity through an instrumental variables Probit model. Our findings indicate that the overconfidence gap acts as a behavioral catalyst, significantly increasing both the likelihood of market entry and subsequent portfolio complexity. Conversely, while self-control facilitates initial participation, we find no statistically significant evidence that it moderates the overconfidence-complexity relationship; this result should not be interpreted as evidence that deliberative regulation is absent or necessarily ineffective.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Oliva et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: