Key result
Rivaroxaban therapy shows suboptimal control, with patients spending only ~47% of time in therapeutic range.
Why the study?
Anticoagulation management with Rivaroxaban and its adverse effect management in tertiary care hospitals required assessment due to the need for high-quality monitoring and dose adjustments.
Does Rivaroxaban therapy monitored by INR testing achieve adequate time in therapeutic range (TTR) and safety in adult outpatients?
Observational (n=374)
Yes
Does Rivaroxaban therapy monitored by INR testing achieve adequate time in therapeutic range (TTR) and safety in adult outpatients?
Anticoagulation management of Rivaroxaban (assessed unusually via INR monitoring) was suboptimal, with low time in therapeutic range and a 17.11% incidence of bleeding complications.
Suboptimal TTR and bleeding events with rivaroxaban warrant closer monitoring in similar cohorts; leaves open whether interventions improve outcomes pending prospective trials.
Background: Anticoagulants are the cornerstone therapy for thromboembolism prevention and treatment. Rivaroxabanis the an oral anticoagulant drug .It needs high-quality anticoagulation monitoring with frequent international normalization ratio (INR) testing. Objective: The study aimed to assess anticoagulation management with Rivaroxaban among adult outpatients and acess its adverse effect management produced in the tertiary care hospital . Methods: A hospital-based retrospective study design that enrolled 374 patients receiving Rivaroxaban was taken in the study conducted at two centres i.e,Jinnah Postgraduate medical centre and Abbasi shaheed hospital. The time in the therapeutic range (TTR) was calculated using the Rosendaal method. Results: The mean age of the patients was 57 years, and 218 (58.3%) participants were females. Out of 3384 INR tests, 1562 (46.5%) were within the therapeutic range and the mean percentage of TTR was 47.24%. Only 25.67% of the patients spent their TTR ≥ 65%. The present study revealed that dose adjustments were required 1764 times. In non-therapeutic INR values of 1764 that required Rivaroxaban dose adjustment, 59.7% of the doses were adjusted. About 262 (70.1%) of co-prescribed medications had drug interaction . Sixty-four patients (17.11%) experienced bleeding events. Conclusion: Anticoagulation management with Rivaroxaban was suboptimal .INR values was not minimal, and many patients encountered bleeding during their course of therapy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Islam et al. (2025) conducted an observational in Thromboembolism prevention and treatment (mostly atrial fibrillation and heart failure) (n=374). Rivaroxaban was evaluated on Time in therapeutic range (TTR). Anticoagulation management with Rivaroxaban was suboptimal, with patients achieving a mean time in therapeutic range of 47.24% and 17.11% experiencing bleeding events.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: