Purpose This study examines how psychological ownership influences user satisfaction in artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted decision-making contexts within sport consumption. While prior research has focused primarily on algorithmic accuracy and outcome quality, it has paid limited attention to users' perceived agency during the decision-making process. This study addresses this gap by investigating the role of autonomy and psychological ownership in shaping consumer responses. Design/methodology/approach A 2 × 2 experimental design was conducted using a fantasy sport decision-making scenario. Participants were randomly assigned to conditions manipulating decision autonomy and AI involvement. Data were analyzed using regression-based moderation analysis. Findings Results revealed a suppression pattern in which self-selection increased psychological ownership, producing a positive indirect effect on satisfaction, while its direct effect on satisfaction was negative. These opposing effects resulted in a nonsignificant total effect. Originality/value This study extends psychological ownership theory into AI-supported sport consumption contexts by demonstrating that decision agency can generate both psychological benefits through increased ownership and satisfaction costs through a negative direct pathway. The findings contribute to both sport consumer behavior literature and emerging research on human–AI interaction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bok et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: