This study investigates the narrative, symbolic, and cultural differences between AI-generated imagery (AIGC) and human-created realist artworks through Panofsky’s three-level iconology framework. The research identifies gaps in semantic logic, cultural depth, and symbolic coherence within AIGC outputs while establishing a systematic analytical model suitable for cross-method evaluation. By integrating qualitative iconological interpretation, computational visual analysis, and expert review, this paper contributes an evaluative paradigm that addresses contemporary challenges in AI-driven visual culture. Findings highlight significant fragmentation in narrative cohesion and symbolic misalignment in AIGC compared with human artworks, emphasizing the importance of cultural semantic grounding in future AI development.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ibrahim et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: